“Who’s Been Doing the Best Job of Drafting – - Perception vs Reality” has probably attracted more comments than any other article published by DRAFTMETRICS. It might be appropriate to follow up that article with a few additional comments and observations.
- DRAFTMETRICS sincerely appreciates any and all comments it receives and gives consideration to any suggestions received. We don’t have all the answers (or all the questions) and sometimes we’re standing a little too close to the trees to see the forest
- Regarding the comments that more than just the draft needs to be considered in rating or judging a team, this article was never intended to be anything more than a review of the draft performance of each team
- From that perspective it doesn’t matter which team a player plays for, just who drafted him
- DRAFTMETRICS has published and will continue to publish other articles regarding all facets of building an NFL team
- DRAFTMETRICS acknowledges that is impossible to judge a draft solely on the basis of numbers. Making judgments based on numbers is kind of what DRAFTMETRICS does, though, and it often provides a view that is different from what is thought to be fact (and which may or not be). DRAFTMETRICS has never claimed that numbers hold all the answers, just that it is another viewpoint worth considering.
- There have been a few comments disparaging the use of starts as a metric in measuring draft performance. Again, DRAFTMETRICS acknowledges that using starts has its flaws.
- It is worth repeating that starts was NOT the only metric used in this article
- We agree that a starting quarterback may not equal in value to a starting center, but on the other hand a superior starting center may be worth more than a lousy starting quarterback.
- DRAFTMETRICS leaves those kind of assessments to others like Pro Football Focus, our mission in life is to concentrate on the measurable
- The use of Pro Bowl selections in the index logarithm does introduce the matter of quality to some degree
- The number of starts is measurable and verifiable and, despite its flaws, does provide useful information. We will continue to use the number of starts as a centerpiece of our analysis. Number of plays from scrimmage may indeed be a better measure than starts, but the NFL only started releasing that data for the 2012 season.
- Other websites have been tracking snaps from scrimmage pre-2012, but it would not be ethical for DRAFTMETRICS to use their information
- As time goes on (and assuming I avoid Alzheimers) I’m sure that snaps from scrimmage will replace starts as our centerpiece. For right now, though, number of starts is a pretty good indicator.
- The issue of the comparative worth of positions can’t be avoided. To decide the relative worth of positions and then comparative performance of the guys playing those positions is a task DRAFTMETRICS will leave to others. Again, it simply isn’t what we set out to do.
- The bottom line is that there is no “perfect” way to measure draft performance. DRAFTMETRCS presented one methodology based on objective outcomes. This methodology should be part of the discussion, not the end of the discussion